Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Patton v. Wicks et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark A Patton
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wicks, Bowden Ladd, Samantha Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Sullivan Co Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Travis J Mitchell
Defendant:
Sullivan Co Sheriffs Office, Board of Probation and Parole, Charles Cochney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Locke v U.S. Government et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Locke
Defendant:
Attorney 1, Attorney 2, U.S. Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Beale v. Shrum et al
as 2:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Lynn Shrum doing business as Smith County Misdemeanor Probation, Smith County, Tennessee, Jenna Meness and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Beale
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Walker v. Shrum et al
as 2:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Smith County, Tennessee, Jenna Meness, Lynn Shrum and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Walker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Patton v. Acree et al (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Freda Ramey, State of Tennessee, Brandon Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Desmond et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Sacramento County Grand Jury, Associated General Contractors of CA. PA and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Glatz v. Newcomb
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Ronald C Newcomb, G.W. McCoig, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
