Cases 11 - 20 of 138
Springview Property Management, LLC v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv14689
Plaintiff:
Springview Property Management, LLC
Defendant:
Aiyah Jackson and Chris Jackson
Kay v. BMV IV IL Fox Valley Villages, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06049
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kay
Defendant:
BMV IV IL Fox Valley Villages, LLC and Bridge Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diaz v. Mays
as 1:2023cv03240
Plaintiff:
Raul Diaz
Defendant:
Buitoni Mays doing business as Northshore Property Management
Stafford v. Chojnacki et al
as 1:2023cv03173
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stafford
Defendant:
Marcin Chojnacki, Laurena Mikosz, Harlem Elmwood LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Said et al v. Chojnacki et al
as 1:2023cv02858
Plaintiff:
Fathi Said and JBV ACQUISITIONS LLC
Defendant:
Marcin Chojnacki, CHASE REAL ESTATE, LLC, Laurena Mikosz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Figueroa et al v. Property Management Experts, Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv02621
Plaintiff:
Lorena Figueroa and Jose Luis Amezcua Casas
Defendant:
Property Management Experts, Incorporated and Damian Santiago
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
