Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03393
Defendant:
QT Vascular Ltd., Eitan Konstantino, Trireme Medical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Angioscore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Maxum Indemnity Company et al v. Quattro Citrus Products, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv01180
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF HAILEY MULLEN, ANNMARIE DESOCIO, LUCIANO GOMES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Santiago et al v. Pesce Pasta Quattro Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10487
Defendant:
Christopher Marchignoli, James Marchignoli and Pesce Pasta Quattro Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angel Caceres and Pablo Lopez Santiago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eastman et al v. QUATTRO DIRECT, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv11900
Plaintiff:
Zachary Rosenberg, Adam McCarthy, Mr. Jason Eastman and others
Defendant:
Resource Marketing Corp., LLC and QUATTRO DIRECT, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Tapia et al v. Pesce Pasta Quattro Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03865
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tapia and Gabriel Martinez
Defendant:
Pesce Pasta Quattro Inc., James Marchignoli and Christopher Marchignoli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orellana v. Quattro et al
as 3:2017cv05755
Plaintiff:
Victor Orellana
Defendant:
Frank Quattro, Jr. and Christina Quattro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quattro v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv10002
Plaintiff:
Laura Quattro
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
