Cases 11 - 20 of 229
HUERTAS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant:
GINA CLARK and MADELINE QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WILLIAMS, III, QUINN WILLIAMS and ON-SITE COMPANIONSHIP SERVICES, CORP.
Defendant:
STEVEN WILLIAMS, JR. and BERNADETTE CERAVOLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
IN RE: RYAN QUINN SHOWALTER
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
RYAN QUINN SHOWALTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUINN v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN QUINN
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA doing business as SUN LIFE FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNTON v. BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BEAVER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BURK v. SGT. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2022cv04747
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
SGT. TAYLOR, MS. BELLINGER, LT. PROSSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
