Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
CID, Unknown William, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Sara Beth Collins, Hazel M. Peterson and Jedediah R. Ewing
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
CID, Burl Cain, Austin William and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Ronald King, Burl Cain and Warden Miller
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Ewing v. Stewart, et al
as 20-60736
Defendant / Appellee:
Doctor Arnold, Individual capacity, Warden F. Shaw, Individual capacity and Lieutenant Stewart, Individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricky R. Ewing
Ricky Ewing v. Gibson, et al
as 19-60724
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN ARNOLD, Individual Capacity and UNKNOWN GIBSON, Individual Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY R. EWING
Ricky Ewing v. J. Burke, et al
as 19-60434
Defendant / Appellee:
N. REED, HSA/Wilkinson County Correctional Facility and DOCTOR J. BURKE, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY R. EWING
Ewing v. Gibson et al
as 3:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Arnold and Mr. Unknown Gibson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. ESA Management, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02006
Defendant:
ESA Management LLC , Zuf Acquisitions I LLC , Zuf Acquisitions LP and others
Plaintiff:
James R Ewing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
