Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Dwayne R. Robinson v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2011cv02010
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Dwayne R Robinson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. Hunt & Henriques et al
as 4:2011cv01867
Plaintiff:
Debra R. Robinson
Defendant:
Hunt & Henriques and Walter S. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Howard R. Robinson v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2010cv05265
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Howard R. Robinson
Ashker v. Cate et al
as 4:2009cv02948
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, Francisco Jacquez, Michael Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2008cv00348
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Steven Brummer, Eric Matlock and others
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2008cv00347
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Steven Brummer, Eric Matlock and others
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Wood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jamie R. Robinson v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00183
Plaintiff:
Jamie R Robinson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Aaron et al, et al v. Aguirre, et al
as 3:2006cv01451
Plaintiff:
Garry Collins, Charles De La Cruz, Daniel K Shepherd and others
Defendant:
Does Doe one through 100, inclusive, Terri Webster, Michael Zucchet and others
Petitioner:
Jackson, DeMarco, Tidus, Petersen & Peckenpaugh and Jackson, DeMarco, Tidus, Peterson & Peckenpaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Abbe, et al v. San Diego City of
as 3:2005cv01629
Plaintiff:
Daniel K Shepherd, Eric C Davis, Jacob M Resch and others
Petitioner:
Jackson, DeMarco, Tidus, Petersen & Peckenpaugh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
