Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Borough v. Allison et al
as 2:2018cv01828
Defendant:
Roxie Allison, IV and Specialized Rail Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derek Borough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barga v. CSX Transporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
Lucas A Barga
Defendant:
CSX Transporation, Inc. and Savage Industrial Rail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Barga v. CSX Transporation, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
Lucas A Barga
Defendant:
CSX Transporation, Inc. and Savage Industrial Rail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company v. United Rail Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Defendant:
United Rail Service, Inc. and United Transportation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Turbo-Mex Refacciones, Mantenimiento Y Seguridad Industrial, S.A. De C.V. v. C&D Rail Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10838
Plaintiff:
Turbo-Mex Refacciones, Mantenimiento Y Seguridad Industrial, S.A. De C.V.
Defendant:
C&D Rail Services Inc. and Cesar E Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Denton v. Road & Rail Services Inc
as 4:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Wesley Denton
Defendant:
Road & Rail Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SMS Rail Service, Inc. v. STB, et al
as 15-1022
Petitioner:
SMS Rail Service, Inc.
Respondent:
Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Paulsboro Refining Company, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
