Cases 11 - 20 of 459
Tillie #636229 v. Tighe
as 1:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Phillip Randall Tillie #636229
Defendant:
Unknown Tighe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitan v. Maclean et al
as 2:2023cv12439
Plaintiff:
Randall Richard Levitan
Defendant:
Maclean, Johnson, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitan #859804 v. Maclean et al
as 1:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Randall Levitan #859804
Defendant:
Unknown Maclean, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill #724440 v. Grover et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Sidney Durell Hill #724440
Defendant:
Randall Grover, Unknown Hungerford, Robert Beaulieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. City of Detroit
as 2:2023cv11956
Defendant:
City of Detroit and Randall Craig
Plaintiff:
Khia Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reedy-Randall v. Opichi Funds, LLC
as 2:2023cv11875
Plaintiff:
Gerrie Reedy-Randall
Defendant:
Opichi Funds, LLC Doing business as eLoanWarehouse
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stanley
Defendant:
County of Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo County Animal Services and Enforcement, lamazoo Sheriff's Office Public Records Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tillie #636229 v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Phillip Randall Tillie #636229
Defendant:
Unknown Miller and Unknown Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Haas
as 4:2023cv11366
Petitioner:
Ronald C. Johnson
Respondent:
Randall Haas and Willis Chapman
St. Croix Hospice Acquisition Corp. v. St. Laurent et al
as 2:2023cv11128
Plaintiff:
St. Croix Hospice Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Randall St. Laurent and Transitions Hospice, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
