Cases 11 - 20 of 84
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64909
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordison et al v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Socorro et al
as 2:2021cv00742
Plaintiff:
Ivan M. Jordison, Patricia Padilla and Careece Carrillo
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Socorro, William Armijo, Richard Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Ochoa v. Roberto Lopez et al
as 8:2021cv00983
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ochoa
Defendant:
Roberto Lopez, Yvonne Acosta, DOES 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Hoover et al v. Lopez et al
as 3:2021cv08108
Defendant:
Richard Lopez, Michael Palacios and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
JB Hoover and Gina Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16337
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez-Albinana v. Wolf
as 3:2020cv07581
Plaintiff:
Richard Lopez-Albinana
Defendant:
Chad Wolf
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Richard Lopez Vasquez v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv07075
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard Lopez Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LOPEZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43310
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOPEZ JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32447
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reggie Mallard v. County of Los Angeles
as 2:2020cv05231
Defendant:
Elizabeth Smith, Justin Lustig, Dannette Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Reggie Mallard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
