Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ryan Corley, Samuel Frank, Nicholas Corpuz and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Deppenbrook, et al v. PBGC
as 13-5254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Deppenbrook, On Behalf of all RIT Beaver Falls Employees 9305-04
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ron Gossard, On Behalf of all RIT Beaver Falls Employees 9305-04, Art Evans, On Behalf of all RIT Beaver Falls Employees 9305-04 and William J. Venezie, Sr., On Behalf of all RIT Beaver Falls Employees 9305-04
Defendant - Appellee:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RITS, LLC v. Big Creek Expeditions, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
RITS, LLC
Defendant:
Big Creek Expeditions, Inc , Outdoor Adventures, Inc , RIP Roaring Adventures, Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
RIP Roaring Adventures, Inc , Big Creek Expeditions, Inc , Rapid Expeditions, LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
RITS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Xiao et al v. Republic of Seychelles et al
as 1:2009cv09845
Plaintiff:
Jie (George) Xiao, Jie (George) Xiao, Jie (George) Xiao and others
Defendant:
Republic of Seychelles, Financial Intelligence Unit of Seychelles, Liam Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fire Innovations, LLC v. Rit Rescue & Escape Systems, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01703
Plaintiff:
Fire Innovations, LLC, Fire Innovations, LLC and Fire Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Rit Rescue & Escape Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
RIT Rescue & Escape Systems, Inc. v. Fire Innovations, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01101
Plaintiff:
RIT Rescue & Escape Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Fire Innovations, LLC and Fire Force, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
