Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Virgil v. Omni Bank et al
as 2:2011mc02744
Plaintiff:
Eric Virgil
Defendant:
Omni Bank, Gasper J Morici, Jr, Bradley Mayeur and others
JONES v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010xc03369
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana State Bar Association, Mark C Landry, RONALD H. NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv03369
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana State Bar Association, Mark C Landry, RONALD H. NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Jones v. Louisiana State Bar Assoc., et al
as 10-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Louisiana State Bar Association, Mark C. Landry, Ronald H. Newman and others
POWELL v. MATHIS
as 1:2003cv00059
Plaintiff:
TERRELL L POWELL
Defendant:
ROBERT K MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR ASSOCIATION, MARK C. LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mathis v. Cates et al
as 1:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Mathis
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, K. J. Allen, M Esther Montenegro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Cates et al
as 2:2009cv00751
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Mathis
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, K. J. Allen, M Esther Montenegro and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mathis v. Norton et al
as 7:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Mathis
Defendant:
Nick Norton, Charles Norton, Cathy Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
