Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Kunhart v. Hunt
as 2:2011cv00236
Defendant:
Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt
Plaintiff:
Robert Kunhart
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Griffin v. Navarro et al
as 2:2010cv02141
Plaintiff:
Eric Griffin
Defendant:
Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt, Robert Johnston and Gloria M. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tanesha Blye, et al v. Alex Kozinski, et al
as 10-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TANESHA WALLS BLYE, JOEL D. JOSEPH, DENNIS E. WIESSNER, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, NINTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL COUNCIL, DAVID R. THOMPSON and others
Harold Krieg v. Kent Dawson, et al
as 09-16632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD BRIAN KRIEG
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT J. DAWSON, Judge, ROGER L. HUNT, Chief Judge, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS and others
Krieg v. Dawson et al
as 2:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Harold Brian Krieg
Defendant:
Kent J Dawson, Judge, Roger L. Hunt, U.S. District Court for Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Gene Smith, Sr. v. Roger Hunt
as 08-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE E. SMITH, SR., an incompetent person
Party-in-Interest - None:
IDA M. CLARK, Guardian for Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER L. HUNT, individually, JAMES C. MAHAN, individually, LAWRENCE R. LEAVITT, Individually and others
Scales v. Hunt et al
as 2:2008cv00983
Plaintiff:
Annie M Scales
Defendant:
Roger L. Hunt, Kent J. Dawson and Lawrence, Magistrate Leavitt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Hunt et al
as 2:2008cv02068
Plaintiff:
Gene E Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Roger L Hunt, James C Mahan, Lawrence R Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Krieg v. Pro et al
as 2:2007cv01325
Plaintiff:
Harold Brian Krieg
Defendant:
Judge Philip M. Pro, Kent J. Dawson, Roger L. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
