Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Benjamin Roark v. Regina Flannery, et al
as 13-40598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. ROARK
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIVIDUALS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORMER AND CURRENT, ERIC HOLDER, ALBERTO GONZALES, Former United States Attorney General and others
Warden v. Robinson
as 4:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Roy Warden
Defendant:
Bob Walkup, Steve Kozachik, Richard Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy Warden v. Mike Rankin, et al
as 12-17756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE RANKIN, individually and in his capacity as City Attorney for the City of Tucson, RICHARD MIRANDA, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police of the Tucson Police Department, KATHLEEN ROBINSON, individually and in her capacity as Assistant Chief of Police of the Tucson Police Department and others
Lawernce Kenemore, Jr. v. Keith Roy
as 12-41111
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWERNCE DERWOOD KENEMORE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH ROY, Warden at FCI Texarkana
Ricky Dority v. Keith Roy
as 12-40100
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY LEON DORITY
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH ROY, Warden
Gene Garland v. Keith Roy
as 11-41030
Petitioner - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
GENE IRVING GARLAND, JR.
Respondent - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
KEITH ROY, Warden
Warden v. Walkup et al
as 4:2011cv00460
Plaintiff:
Roy Warden
Defendant:
Bob Walkup, Mike Rankin, Alan Merritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawernce Kenemore, Jr. v. Keith Roy
as 10-41299
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWERNCE DERWOOD KENEMORE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH ROY, Warden
Ricky Dority v. Keith Roy
as 10-40288
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY LEON DORITY
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH ROY, Warden
Robert Salter, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 10-40226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS SALTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, VIRGINIA SIMIEN, Hospital Administrator of Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
