Cases 11 - 20 of 22
WILLIAMS v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 1:2020cv12272
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., KARL HICK and others
Plaintiff:
OLWYN RACHAEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Choroszy v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv11507
Plaintiff:
Zygmunt Choroszy, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie, Rachael Sartini, Vicent W Ng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Toop v. Rollings
as 1:2019cv11062
Defendant:
Rachael Rollings and Rachael Rollins
Plaintiff:
Audra Toop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryan et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2019cv11003
Plaintiff:
Committee for Public Counsel Services, Chelsea Collaborative, Inc., Marian Ryan and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Todd M. Lyons and others
Amicus Curiae:
Prof. Bowie and HIRC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2015cv13903
Plaintiff:
Rachael Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrison v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv40098
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Rachael Faith Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Cowe v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV) et al
as 1:2015cv12308
Plaintiff:
Neal A. Cowe
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV), Rachael Kaprielian and Ellen M. Frith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrsion v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv40211
Plaintiff:
Rachael Faith Morrsion
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Katz v. Lakey
as 3:2010cv30067
Plaintiff:
Rachael Katz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
