Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Hart v. Judd
as 8:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Sheriff Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Upham v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Upham
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
ALLEN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
RANDY ALLEN
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Talen Pizza, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen
Defendant:
Talen Pizza, Inc. and Troy C. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Randy Allen Watson v. Kilolo Kijakazi et al
as 5:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Watson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hart v. Auburndale Police Department
as 8:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Auburndale Police Department
as 8:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Auburndale Police Department
as 8:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Auburndale Police Department et al
as 8:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Department and Polk County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marler v. Langford
as 22-3196
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDY ALLEN MARLER
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD LANGFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
