Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Rodriguez v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00041
Petitioner: Raul Rodriguez
Respondent: James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Raul Rodriguez
as 23-1646
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RAUL RODRIGUEZ, also known as JULIAN RODRIGUEZ also known as CARLOS HERIBERTO RIOS CABELLO also known as
Barberi v. LOPEZ TIRES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv21168
Plaintiff: Renzo Barberi
Defendant: LOPEZ TIRES, INC., RAUL RODRIGUEZ and NORA RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv00857
Plaintiff: Robert Noble Shell
Defendant: Ed Gonzalez, Teiva Bell, Harris County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez v. Zaldivar-Galvez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff: Raul Rodriguez
Defendant: Idalberto Zaldivar-Galvez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16999
Plaintiff: RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00618
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Contreras Coria v. Garland
as 22-893
Petitioner: DORANELLY CONTRERAS CORIA and RAUL RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?