Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gaines v. Zynga Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv04133
Plaintiff: Ira Gaines
Defendant: Zynga Inc., Mark Pincus, David M. Wehner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Diemand v. Zynga Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04059
Plaintiff: Steven T. Diemand
Defendant: Zynga Inc., Mark Pincus, Reginald D. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In Re Zynga Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2012cv04007
Plaintiff: Joy Arjoon-Singh, Mark H. Destefano and David Fee
Defendant: Allen & Company LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Reginald D. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Destefano v. Zynga, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04007
Plaintiff: Mark H. Destefano
Defendant: Zynga, Inc. , Mark Pincus , David M. Wehner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: Reginald Davi
as 11-10634
Movant: In re: REGINALD D DAVIS
Davis v. Louisiana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00795
Plaintiff: Reginald D Davis
Defendant: State of Louisiana, Dept of Probation & Parole DeSoto Parish and DeSoto Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2011cv00795
Plaintiff: Reginald D Davis
Defendant: State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BUCKS COUNTY, PA
as 2:2010cv05944
Plaintiff: REGINALD D. DAVIS
Defendant: BUCKS COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Quarterman
as 08-10896
Petitioner - Appellant: REGINALD D DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00395
Petitioner: Reginald D Davis
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?