Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Samuels v. Scott et al
as 5:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Charles Rex Scott, Ramona L Emanuel, Treneisha S Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Paul v. Charles Scott
as 14-31368
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS PAUL
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES REX SCOTT, Warden, Union Parish Detention Center
Samuels v. Prator et al
as 5:2014cv02437
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Charles Rex Scott, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Black v. Don Hathaway, et al
as 14-30831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DON HATHAWAY, ALLEN HARRIS, MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY and others
Black v. Hathaway et al
as 5:2014cv00822
Plaintiff:
Harold Joe Black
Defendant:
Don Hathaway, Allen Harris, Hornsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickey Cade v. Charles Scott, et al
as 13-31107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICKEY CADE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES REX SCOTT, UNKNOWN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, RAMONA EMANUEL and others
Samuels v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2013cv02775
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Ramona Emanuel, Charles Rex Scott, Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens et al v. McKesson et al
as 3:2013cv04406
Plaintiff:
James Stephens , Marvin Freeman , Robert Blevins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephens et al v. McKesson et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-04406
Plaintiff:
James Stephens , Marvin Freeman , Robert Blevins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Ellis v. Montgomery et al
as 5:2013cv02502
Plaintiff:
Michael D Ellis
Defendant:
Dale N Montgomery, II, Charles Rex Scott, Unknown Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
