Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Weakley #136914 v. Garrelts et al
as 1:2019cv00433
Defendant:
Richard J. Behnke, Clinton D. Roach, Unknown Salisbury and others
Plaintiff:
Travell Weakley #136914
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderton et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11306
Plaintiff:
Eric Palm, Michael Arrington, William Roberts and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, General Motors LLC and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Roach #923081 v. Haataja et al
as 2:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Eugene Roach #923081
Defendant:
Unknown Johnson, Unknown Haataja and Unknown Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Keene et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Defendant:
Tim Keene, Kevin Cook, Cass County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Door Latches - End-Payor Actions
as 2:2017cv04303
Defendant:
Brose Fahrzeugteile GmbH & Co. KG, Brose North America, Inc., Brose Schliesysteme GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Morrow, Jessica DeCastro, Edward Muscara and others
In Re:
Door Latches - End-Payor Actions
Not Classified By Court:
113 Class Member Objectors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Door Latches Actions
as 2:2017cv04300
Defendant:
Brose Fahrzeugteile GmbH & Co. KG, Brose North America, Inc., Brose Schliesysteme GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Morrow, Jessica DeCastro, Edward Muscara and others
In Re:
Door Latches Actions
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Craigo v. Behnke et al
as 1:2018cv00739
Defendant:
Susanne Salisbury, Cass County Jail, Richard J. Behnke and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Craigo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
