Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Felton L. Matthews, Jr. VS Eighth Judicial District Court, et al.
as 3:2003cv00432
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Clark County Detention Center, Clark County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Robert Langford v. Willie Smith, et al
as 11-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden, N. NORWOOD and ERICA HUSS
Robert Langford v. Kenneth McKee, et al
as 11-2584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH MCKEE, Warden, C. STODDARD and D. TRAMMELL
Robert Langford v. Unknown Party #1, et al
as 11-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as "Unknown Central Receipts Personal - Supervisor" , et al
Robert Langford v. Lawrence Stelma, et al
as 10-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE A. STELMA and TIMOTHY BERNHARDT, et al.
United States v. Langford
as 10-6070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT M. LANGFORD
Robert Langford v. Lawrence Stelma, et al
as 10-1054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE A. STELMA and TIMOTHY BERNHARDT, et al.
Robert M. Langford v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77747
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Langford
LANGFORD v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77747
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M LANGFORD and ROBERT M LANGFORD
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Langford v. Arnott et al
as 6:2009cv03151
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Langford, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Arnott, Kenneth Clayton, Melissa Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
