Cases 11 - 20 of 31
John Armstrong, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-16018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD PONCIANO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., MICHAEL MINOR, MATTHEW CATE and others
Leonardo Lyons v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-55542
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONARDO LYONS
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and ROBERT AMBROSELLI, Director, Division of Adult Parole Operations
Serafine v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Lucas M Serafine
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Matthew Cate , CDR Division of Adult Parole Operations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince Tony Goodo v. Robert Ambroselli
as 2:2012cv00314
Respondent:
Robert Ambroselli
Petitioner:
Prince Tony Goodo
Ben Fischetto v. Matthew Cate et al
as 2:2011cv10168
Respondent:
Robert Ambroselli and Matthew Cate
Petitioner:
Ben Fischetto
Turner v. Grottkau et al
as 5:2011cv05828
Petitioner:
Stephen B. Turner
Respondent:
Mike Grottkau, Jennifer Shaffer, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv05176
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Turner
Defendant:
Melody Smith, Gregory Sims, John Bent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv04948
Petitioner:
Stephen B. Turner
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, Robert Ambroselli, Edmund Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James D Maciel Sr v. Robert Ambroselli et al
as 2:2011cv07199
Respondent:
Robert Ambroselli and Matthew Cate
Petitioner:
James D Maciel, Sr
Diaz v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv03459
Plaintiff:
Sergio Diaz
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Debbie Rives and Robert Ambroselli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
