Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Adeniji v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
Oscar Adedayo Idowu Adeniji
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, Melvin Pederson, Willie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hardy v. Astrue
as 5:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Hardy
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sayman v. Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, PLLC et al
as 3:2012cv00787
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Sayman
Defendant:
Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, PLLC , Steven B. Fox , Steven G. Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hebert v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00141
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Hebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SPINKS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00872
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. SPINKS
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hardy
as 3:2010cv00546
Plaintiff:
Robert K Hardy
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mahmood v. Driggers et al
as 3:2010cv00409
Petitioner:
Abdur Rahim Mahmood
Respondent:
Curtis D. Driggers, Jr, Tim J. Sielaff and Robert K. Trobich
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers et al v. Queens Gap Mountain, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Myers , Audrey V. Myers , Patrick Q. Gaffney and others
Defendant:
Queens Gap Mountain, LLC, Devinshire Land Development, LLC, Devin F. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. TROBICH
as 1:2010mc00011
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
ROBERT K. TROBICH
Taylor v. Bettis, et al
as 7:2009cv00183
Defendant:
Lee W Bettis, Pat L Pittman, Joanne K Partin and others
Plaintiff:
Chris W Taylor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
