Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Reeves v. McCarthy
as 1:2020cv03746
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Petitioner:
Robert Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02359
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Zurich American Insurance Company and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. Viking Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00200
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves
Defendant:
Viking Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a City Ambulance Services, Mohamad Massoud and Viking Enterprise Inc. doing business as City Ambulance Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REEVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT REEVE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78724
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams et al v. Glass et al
as 2:2020cv11053
Defendant:
Willis Chapman, Noah Nagy, Bryan Morrison and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard, Craig Seegmiller, Jamine Campbell and others
Amicus Curiae:
ATTY David C Kimball-Stanley, ATTY Andrew NIckelhoff, ATTY SUSANNA BUERGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram et al v. County of Wayne
as 2:2020cv10288
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves and Melisa Ingram
Defendant:
County of Wayne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reeves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05007
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. BARD INC
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Brown v. Robert Perrine, et al
as 19-12221
Defendant / Appellee:
RUCKER SMITH, ROBERT REEVE, JOHN E. NORTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BROWN
Robert Reeves v. Cathleen Stoddard
as 19-1179
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHLEEN STODDARD
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT REEVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
