Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Guentter v. Surface Oncology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06687
Plaintiff:
TJ Guentter
Defendant:
Surface Oncology, Inc., Denise Torres, Carsten Brunn and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ben Hickey
Seyfried v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Elijah Seyfried
Defendant:
Robert Ross and Airbnb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Frenchko v. Monroe et al
as 4:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Niki Frenchko
Defendant:
Paul Monroe, Trumbull County, Trumbull County Board of Commissioners and others
Interested Party:
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jayson Ross
as 23-11156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAYSON ROBERT ROSS
Ross v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv20855
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Ross v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv10982
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corporation, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. USA
as 23-40058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Ross
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Ross v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv03017
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
. Greene, . Ashcraft, Serena Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIGSBY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09005
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROSS RIGSBY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
