Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Williams v. Roe et al
as 2:2021cv11578
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Raynard Williams
Defendant:
Kayla Roe, Lamont Nelson, Alejandro Vela M. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blackwell-Esters et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv11586
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Blackwell-Esters and Tyrese Jackson
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Kayla Roe, Lamont Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc.
as 2:2021cv10312
Plaintiff:
Trutek Corp.
Defendant:
BlueWillow Biologics, Inc., Robin Roe 1 Through 10 and ABC Corporation 1 though 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Izzo Golf, Inc. f/k/a Dancorp Investors, Inc. v. King Par Corporation et al
as 2:2020mc50830
Plaintiff:
Izzo Golf, Inc. f/k/a Dancorp Investors, Inc.
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation 1-10, B & P Baird Holdings, Inc., Mary Roe 10 and others
Izzo Golf, Inc. f/k/a Dancorp Investors, Inc. v. King Par Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv11920
Plaintiff:
Izzo Golf, Inc. f/k/a Dancorp Investors, Inc.
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation 1-10, B & P Baird Holdings, Inc., Mary Roe 10 and others
Gravatt et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11374
Plaintiff:
Bob Hafler, Fred Mikolon, Matthew Stopczynski and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Price v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv12874
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoeltzel v. Pillsbury et al
as 2:2019cv12328
Defendant:
Tom Cargill, Lucas, Jane Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Franklin Hoeltzel
Hyman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv11821
Defendant:
Rochelle Phipps, City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hyman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
