Cases 11 - 20 of 633
BEARD v. AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
ROGER BEARD
Defendant:
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., JAMAL OMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PRINGLE v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00450
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finnegan v. Tetzloff et al
as 3:2023cv00738
Defendant:
Jeniffer Tetzloff, Jeniff Tetzloff, Kim Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Moody et al
as 3:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Moody, English, Rekitzke and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Franklin
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Roger Sloan
Defendant:
Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
