Cases 11 - 20 of 160
MORRIS v. WASHINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
SHELDON LEE MORRIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PBPP) and DANIEL RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AY Trucking, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05407
Plaintiff:
AY Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
ASSOCIATES ACCEPTANCE INC. doing business as RUSH TRUCK INSURANCE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ST. CHARLES v. AMRHEIN et al
as 2:2021cv01133
Plaintiff:
ALLEN L. ST. CHARLES
Defendant:
AMRHEIN, ZELAPOS, T. LANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THE BALTIMORE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. POLLANA et al
as 2:2021cv00697
Defendant:
CHRISTIE LYNN POLLANA, ESTATE OF JOHN R. POLLANA, RONNIE JAMES KOSARIK and others
Plaintiff:
THE BALTIMORE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RUSH v. SUPERINTENDENT, FOREST SCI et al
as 2:2020cv01256
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, FOREST SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JOHN L. RUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson, Jr. v. Mace-Liebson et al
as 1:2020cv01247
Defendant:
Richard Andruezzi, Douglas McClintock, David Rush and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
RUSH et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03424
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. RUSH and RICHARD RUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
