Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Rogers v. McMahon et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Ryan McMahon, City Planning and Aquarium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1815
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1480
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Johnson v. Jefferson et al
as 5:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
A. Jefferson, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, J. Ryan McMahon II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillory v. McMahon et al
as 5:2021cv00912
Plaintiff:
Patrick Guillory
Defendant:
Ryan McMahon and Jobs Plus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. McMahon, et al
as 1:2021cv00768
Defendant:
Police Officer Fnu Pollack, Chief of Police Calvin D. Williams, Police Officer Ryan McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest C. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Dorsey et al
as 2:2021at00118
Defendant:
Jordan Patzer, Barbara Dorsey, City of Vallejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2021cv00255
Defendant:
Jordan Patzer, City of Vallejo, Andrew Bidou and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2021at00119
Defendant:
Jordan Patzer, City of Vallejo, Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
I.F et al v. City of Vallejo et al
as 3:2020mc80075
Plaintiff:
Paula McGowan, R. F., I.F and others
Defendant:
City of Vallejo and Ryan McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
