Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Lake v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv07618
Defendant:
Dr. S. H. Wong-Do, Jean Weiss, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
John Lake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) Brown v. Do
as 2:2020cv01673
Defendant:
S. H. Wong Do and S. H. Wong
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shatswell v. Taylor et al
as 3:2019cv06883
Defendant:
S. H. Campaigne, J. Taylor, Thomson and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Michael Shatswell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novelty Textile, Inc. v. One Step Up, Ltd. et al
as 2:2018cv07185
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Amazon Corporate, LLC, One Step Up, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Novelty Textile, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gail Migdal Title
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Dunham v. Najem et al
as 3:2018cv04467
Defendant:
J. N. Sullivan, D. E. Vargas, Z. D. Swift and others
Plaintiff:
John F. Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Marcus et al
as 2:2018mc00040
Defendant:
Paralegal Support Group, LLC, Yisbet Segrea, 16 S H Street Lake Worth, LLC; and others
Plaintiff:
State of Florida and Federal Trade Commission
Undetermined:
Jonathan Perlman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. C M S H Electrical et al
as 2:2017cv02253
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
C M S H Electrical and CMSH Electrical Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Scott v. Beregovskay, et al.
as 1:2017cv01146
Plaintiff:
Tiante Dion Scott
Defendant:
Olga Beregovskay, A. Shittu, Ndukwe N. Odeluga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
