Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Schaum v. Griffin et al
as 3:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Kody Schaum
Defendant:
Kathy Griffin, Officer Conrad and Sargent Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SARGENT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02726
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
FARLEY SARGENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caudill v. Officer Hayes et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Nathan Caudill and Rodney Smith
Defendant:
IA Officer Hayes, Officer Chuck Weiland , Captain Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRITT v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Defendant:
SHERIFF FRANK ANDERSON, WARDEN JEFF CONWAY, MR. DOE and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. PRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THURMAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2012cv01523
Defendant:
ALL APPEALS COURT CLERKS, JACOB ANTANGA, CYNTHIA AYERS and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Bechtel Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
Minie L Dixon
Defendant:
Bechtel Corporation, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERRIS v. SARGENT et al
as 1:2011cv00836
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY DEPUTY DAVID WILLIAMS, DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and DALLAS SARGENT
Plaintiff:
PAULA FERRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SARGENT v. PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00629
Defendant:
PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
DIANE SARGENT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HUNTER v. LEVCO et al
as 3:2011cv00034
Defendant:
BARRY S. BLACKARD, DOCTOR GLAVIN, STANLEY LEVCO and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
