Cases 11 - 20 of 1,269
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. United States Veterans Administration
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Rivers v. South Mountain Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
South Mountain Justice Center, Viswanath Dhyaram, Brian Crimp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Veterans Administration
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Joseph R Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Goldstein et al v. Henry et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Alex Goldstein, Scott Whittington and Armour LLC doing business as Redneck Wine Company
Defendant:
Ben Henry and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
