Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Patrick County School Board v. Amerada Hess Corporation
as 1:2004cv02070
Defendant: BP Amoco Chemical Company, El Paso Corporation, Getty Properties Corporation and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: Patrick County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City of Sioux City, Iowa v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv01723
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company ,individualy and doing business as ARCO products Company (f/k/a Arco Petroleum Co.), and also known as ARCO, BP Amoco Chemical Co., Chevron Texaco Corp. ,individualy and formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation (d/b/a Chevron Products Company, d/b/a Chevron Chemical Company) and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: City of Sioux City, Iowa, Galva City of, Ida Grove City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Shell Oil Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv10470
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Through The Environmental Quality Board
Defendant: Shell Oil Co., ExxonMobil Corporation, Shell Company Puerto Rico LTD and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Citgo Petroleum Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: John and Jane Does Nos. 1-99
Cross Defendant: John and Jane Does Nos. 100-200
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
SHELL CHEMICAL LP et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00641
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: SHELL CHEMICAL LP, EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY and others
Interested Party: SHELL OIL COMPANY and ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Shell Chemical LP, Shell Chemicals Canada (f/k/a Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.) by its managing partner Shell Canada Ltd., et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2020cv00525
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff: Shell Chemical LP, Shell Chemicals Canada (f/k/a Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.) by its managing partner Shell Canada Ltd.,, Shell Trading (US) Company, ., Pennzoil-Quaker State Company (formerly d/b/a SOPUS Products) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Shell Trading (US) Company v. Best Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2019cv02267
Defendant: Best Petroleum Corporation
Plaintiff: Shell Trading (US) Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marrero-Rolon, et al v. Shell Trading (US) Co., et al
as 16-8049
Respondent: ISMAEL MARRERO-ROLON, ANNE CATESBY JONES, JORGE VALDES LLAUGER and others
Defendant: ASOCIACION DE JUBILADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA ELECTRICA, a/k/a Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), WILLIAM RODNEY CLARK, EDWIN RODRIGUEZ and others
Petitioner: SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant: El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff: Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner: Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne: Barker Hamill
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sevy v. BP PLC, et al
as 1:2013cv03587
Plaintiff: Michael Sevy
Defendant: BP PLC,, Royal Sutch Shell PLC,, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
White Oaks Fund LP v. BP PLC et al
as 1:2013cv04553
Plaintiff: White Oaks Fund LP
Defendant: BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?