Cases 11 - 20 of 25
ARRINGTON v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2021cv01020
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARRINGTON
Defendant:
BILL SHOUPPE and ETHEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOUSER v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. HOUSER
Defendant:
WILLIAM SHOUPPE and ETHEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
IRVING v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
MANDEL IRVING
Defendant:
BILL SHOUPPE and ETHEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WINCHESTER et al v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2021cv00139
Defendant:
COUNSELOR/TREATMENT JENN MONZA, DEPUTY WARDEN ETHEL WHITE, WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CANSLER, AIDAN HOMER, PATRICK HAYNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SHOUPPE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv04816
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P SHOUPPE
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYNOLDS v. BLACKMON
as 5:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
BRIAN REYNOLDS
Defendant:
B E BLACKMON, LOWERY, EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. SHOUPPE, et al
as 5:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
TRACY ALLEN PETERS
Defendant:
GREG SHOUPPE, GINA JONES and CONNIE COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. JONES, et al
as 5:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
GARRETT LEE JONES
Defendant:
MARY JONES, GREG SHOUPPE and DEREK GAFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAINES v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2014cv01685
Plaintiff:
H. JEROME RAINES, SR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM SHOUPPE, JENN MONZA and KIM MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shoupp v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Shoupp
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
