Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALLWOOD v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2018cv01038
Respondent:
CURTIS T. HILL and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMALLWOOD v. NOLL et al
as 1:2018cv00190
Defendant:
CAMAY FRANCUM, DR. NOLL and B SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02014
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RONALD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Speer v. Smallwood et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Defendant:
Jay Smallwood and Joseph Gentile
Plaintiff:
Brent Speer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUZON et al v. SMALLWOOD et al
as 1:2015cv00864
Counter Claimant:
GAMEFACE, INC. and STACY SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
GAMEFACE, INC. and STACY SMALLWOOD
Counter Defendant:
BRIAN LAUZON and LAUZON & ASSOCIATES
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LAUZON and LAUZON & ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SMALLWOOD v. BUTTS
as 1:2011cv01371
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMALLWOOD v. TRANS-CARE, INC.
as 2:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
TRANS-CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smallwood v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Monroe Smallwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
