Cases 11 - 20 of 1,585
People of the State of Michigan et al v. Bey
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan, Kyle Brandon Butler, Ronald J. Schafer and others
Defendant:
Malik Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Bishop v. State of Michigan-Unemployment Insurance Agency
as 2:2024cv10588
Plaintiff:
Shameka Jamice Bishop
Defendant:
State of Michigan-Unemployment Insurance Agency
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKennedy v. The State of Michigan
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Calvin McKennedy
Defendant:
The State of Michigan
Jones v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10502
Plaintiff:
Michael Magik Jones
Defendant:
MDOC, People of the State of Michigan and Ingham County Jail
Bailey v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2024cv10486
Petitioner:
Larry James Bailey
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Clifford Frost, Jr. v. Dana Nessel
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JAMES FROST, JR.
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan; in official capacity
Jonathon Edick v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1109
Petitioner:
JONATHON EDICK and JONATHON LOYD EDICK
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, identified on initiating document as People of the State of Michigan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
