Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Wilson v. Stinson
as 3:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Jawuan Wilson
Defendant:
Chris Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree Covington, L.L.C. et al v. Car Rou La Kia L.L.C.
as 2:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Roundtree Covington, L.L.C., Roundtree Automotive Group, L.L.C., Frank Stinson and others
Defendant:
CAR ROU LA KIA L.L.C. and Car Rou La Kia L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Charles v. Stinson
as 3:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Emile Charles
Defendant:
Chris Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Stinson
as 5:2022cv01109
Petitioner:
Brittany Tyson
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Stinson
Defendant:
Chris Stinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teno v. Stinson
as 3:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah R Teno
Defendant:
Chris Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. Stinson et al
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Matthew Caleb Sawyer
Defendant:
Chris Stinson, Tommy Farmers, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
John L Mays, Jr
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Shreveport Police Dept, Internal Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mays v. Bossier City Court et al
as 5:2021cv03843
Plaintiff:
John L Mays, Jr
Defendant:
Bossier City Court, Thomas A Wilson, Jr, Ford Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray et al v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
James Murray, Latavius Paschal and Antone Henderson
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Sammie Byrd, LaSalle Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
