Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Antonio Murillo-Rivera v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70268
Petitioner: ANTONIO DE JESUS MURILLO-RIVERA
Respondent: SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00722
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yeferson Figueroa-Romero, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60049
Petitioner: YEFERSON FIGUEROA-ROMERO and LEVIS MARIELA ROMERO-LICONA, also known as Lervs Romero-Licona, also known as Levis Maricela Romero Licona
Respondent: SALLY Q. YATES, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
ARMAMENT SERVICES INT'L, INC. et al v. YATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017mc00010
Petitioner: ARMAMENT SERVICES INT'L, INC. and MAURA ELLEN KELERCHIAN
Respondent: SALLY Q. YATES, THOMAS E. BRANDON, JUAN F. ORELLANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Lorena Espinoza Aguilar v. Jefferson Session We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-70260
Petitioner: LORENA ESPINOZA AGUILAR, AKA Lorena Espinoza Andrade
Respondent: SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Rongxiang Chen v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70269
Petitioner: RONGXIANG CHEN
Respondent: SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Frederic Collins v. Sally Yates et al
as 2:2017cv00752
Plaintiff: Fredric Collins
Defendant: John Does, Justin Okun and Sally Q Yates
Matias Munguia-Perez v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70271
Petitioner: MATIAS MUNGUIA-PEREZ, AKA Matias Perez
Respondent: SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Rahman v. Yates
as 17-281
Petitioner: Mostafuzur Rahman
Respondent: Sally Q. Yates, Acting Unites States Attorney General
Pipul v. Session
as 17-294
Petitioner: Mohammed Uzzal Pipul, AKA Mohammed Mahidur Rahman
Respondent: Jeff Sessions, United States Attorney General and Sally Q. Yates, Acting United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?