Cases 11 - 20 of 47
HASTEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88596
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN HASTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENESKY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85618
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN JENESKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COCO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16101
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE SAMUELL JOHN COCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DREYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04248
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN DREYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZANGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89266
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN ZANGER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87269
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Samuel Pego
as 20-1317
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL JOHN PEGO
Boitano v. Privateer LLC
as 3:2019cv01775
Plaintiff:
John Samuel "Sam" Boitano and Samuel John Stebbins
Defendant:
Privateer LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
US v. Samuel Abraham
as 19-4790
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMUEL JOHN ABRAHAM, a/k/a Jamal S. Ibrahim, a/k/a J. Samuel Ibrahim, a/k/a John S. Wynn
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Samuel Major-Davis v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-11383
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL JOHN MAJOR-DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
