Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Tischer v. Schaeffler Group USA Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv00900
Defendant:
Schaeffler Group USA Inc., Schaeffler AG, Schaeffler Aerospace USA Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dirk Tischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Auto Parts Antitrust Litig, et al
as 19-101
Respondent:
SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC., NTN USA CORPORATION, JTEKT CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
In re: DALC GEAR & BEARING SUPPLY CORPORATION, SHERMAN BEARINGS, INC. and MCGUIRE BEARING COMPANY
Berdeau v. Schaeffler Group USA Inc et al
as 4:2017cv02744
Plaintiff:
Jason Berdeau
Defendant:
Schaeffler Group USA Inc and Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
GEICO Corporation et al v. Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd et al
as 2:2017cv10893
Plaintiff:
GEICO Corporation , Government Employees Insurance Co , Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd, Aisin Automotive Casting, LLC, ASMO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California v. Schaeffler Group USA Inc.
as 2:2017cv10500
Defendant:
Schaeffler Group USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Boring v. Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Creg Boring
Defendant:
Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. and LuK USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lang v. Schaeffler Group USA, Inc
as 0:2016cv02421
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Lang
Defendant:
Schaeffler Group USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
