Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Bonner v. Lane et al
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Darnell Bonner
Defendant:
Lane, Schmidt, Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Beth M Schmidt, Clifford V Maddox, Sr. and Merchants Credit Adjusters, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Schmidt v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Schmidt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Schmidt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 4:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Julie B Schmidt
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2016cv03089
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Missy Lynn Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Schmidt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv03017
Plaintiff:
Tammy Joanne Schmidt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schmidt et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv04172
Plaintiff:
Carey Schmidt and Casey Schmidt
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC v. NCMIC Finance Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin LLC
Defendant:
NCMIC Finance Corporation, NCMIC Group, Inc., Tracy Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
State of Iowa v. Schmidt
as 1:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa
Defendant:
Merle Richard Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schmidt R v. Smolik et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Merle Richard Schmidt R
Defendant:
Kandyce Smolik and Rob Rotter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
