Cases 11 - 20 of 867
ADECLAT v. Kent Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv20406
Plaintiff:
MILIENNE ADECLAT
Defendant:
Kent Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Wonders v. AKCT, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Howard Wonders
Defendant:
AKCT, LLC, RE-AKCT SECURITY SERVICES, INC and Re-Akct Security Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Watson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08975
Plaintiff:
Korey Watson
Defendant:
City of New York, FJC Security Services, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10201
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Joel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
