Cases 11 - 20 of 336
SHAW v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
JADEN SHAW
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE EMPLOYEES, CLYDE BRANSON, JOHN LANKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JENKINS et al v. DEVOE et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
KAREN ELIZABETH JENKINS and JASON SCOTT PETTY
Defendant:
TYLER DEVOE, WEST CALN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., OFFICER JAMES D. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGLE v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01772
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
SECRETARY LITTLE, SUPERINTENDENT ARMEL, DEPUTY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. SHAW
as 2:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
PAUL KENDRICK
Defendant:
C.O. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FARMER-SHAW v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN FARMER-SHAW
Defendant:
FORMER SEC JOHN WETZEL, FOMER SUPT CLARK, SUPT OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH et al NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, et al
as 5:2022cv03788
Plaintiff:
GRACE SMITH, MICHAEL O. SMITH and J.A. SMITH
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, MONROE COUNTY, ADELAIDE GRACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SHAW v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
