Cases 11 - 20 of 151
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
County of Cuyahoga et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2023op45003
Plaintiff:
County of Cuyahoga, County of Ashtabula, County of Harrison and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sandoz, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv21048
Plaintiff:
Palm Beach County, FL., Alachua County, FL, Levy County, FL and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80431
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Indivior Inc., Asserto Therapeutics and others
Plaintiff:
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, Alachua County, FL, Levy County, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Burlington Drug Company, Inc. et al v. Merck & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc., J M Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company and others
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
JM Smith Corporation v. Cystic Fibrosis Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2021mc00165
Plaintiff:
JM Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company
Defendant:
Cystic Fibrosis Pharmacy, Inc., HHCS Pharnacy, Inc. doing business as Freedom Pharnacy and N. Lois Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
J M Smith Corporation v. Belvedere Enterprises Inc et al
as 7:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company
Defendant:
Belvedere Enterprises Inc doing business as Belvedere Pharmacy, Loch Raven Pharmacy Inc doing business as Campus Pharmacy and Anwar Yousuf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
