Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Feesers Inc v. Michael Foods Inc, et al
as 09-2993
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEESERS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL FOODS INC
Defendant - Appellant:
SODEXHO INC
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
WASHINGTON LEGAL
Feesers Inc v. Michael Foods Inc
as 09-2952
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEESERS INC
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL FOODS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
SODEXHO INC
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
WASHINGTON LEGAL
Feesers Inc v. Michael Foods Inc, et al
as 09-2548
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEESERS INC
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL FOODS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
SODEXHO INC
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
WASHINGTON LEGAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Sodexho Inc
as 09-1975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PRITSKER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
SODEXHO INC, SODEXHO AMER LLC, ARAMARK CORP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009mc00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Duffy, et al v. Sodexho Inc
as 08-4822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL F. DUFFY, SANDRA E. MIRZEJEWSKI and DIANE ANDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SODEXHO INC
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Sodexho, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00922
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Sodexho, Inc., Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc., Sodexho America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
