Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Matheson et al v. Sodexho, Inc
as 3:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
Kathy Matheson and David Matheson
Defendant:
Sodexho, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hawkins v. Sodexho, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv14920
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hawkins
Defendant:
Sodexho, Inc. and SEIU Healthcare Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
USA, et al v. Sodexho Inc, et al
as 11-3929
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PRITSKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SODEXHO INC, ARAMARK CORP, COMPASS GRP USA, AKA Chartwells and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-56754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Luz Ortiz v. Sodexho Operations LLC, et al
as 11-56753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUZ MARIA ORTIZ, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated current and former employees of Sodexho Operations LLC, Sodexho Inc and affiliated companies
Defendant - Appellee:
SODEXHO OPERATIONS LLC, a Delaware corporation and SODEXHO INC AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES, a Delaware corporation
luz Maria Ortiz v. Sodexho Operations LLC et al
as 3:2011cv01295
Plaintiff:
Luz Maria Ortiz
Defendant:
Sodexho Operations LLC , Sodexho Inc and Affiliated Companies and does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
luz Maria Ortiz v. Sodexho Operations LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04158
Defendant:
Does, Sodexho Inc and Affiliated Companies and Sodexho Operations LLC
Plaintiff:
Luz Maria Ortiz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
