Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Henderson v. Murphy, III et al
as 1:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Stephen J. Murphy, III, Carol Cohron, James E. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00735
Plaintiff:
KENNY A. MARTIN, CARLOS ELLIS POWELL, ERIC JEROME POWELL and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR., STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
John Sandles v. Clay, et al
as 12-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. CLAY, JOHN M. ROGERS, JAMES L. GRAHAM and others
SANDLES v. Clay et al
as 2:2012cv12117
Plaintiff:
John Eric SANDLES
Defendant:
Eric L. Clay , John M. Rodger , James L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner et al v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2010cv12276
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Turner , Jeanne Ackerly , Ernest R. Coston and others
Defendant:
City of Boston , Boston City Council , Michael Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Clark v. Stephen Murphy, et al
as 09-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, JULIE A. BECK, KAREN M. GIBBS and others
USA v. Stephen Murphy
as 09-55782
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN J. MURPHY
Schied v. Daughtrey et al
as 2:2008cv14944
Plaintiff:
David Schied
Defendant:
Martha Craig Daughtrey , David William McKeague , Gregory F Van Tatenhove and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Clark v. Murphy et al
as 2:2008cv11255
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
Stephen J. Murphy, Julie A Beck, Karen M Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
