Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Horton v. SunPath Ltd
as 3:2022cv02111
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
SunPath Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jackson v. SunPath, Ltd. et al
as 4:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C. Jackson
Defendant:
SunPath, Ltd. and AM Protection Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Peinado v. GQ SOLUTIONS LLC d/b/a VAC et al
as 3:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Abraham Peinado
Defendant:
GQ SOLUTIONS LLC d/b/a VAC and SUNPATH LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perrong v. Pelican Investment Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Perrong
Defendant:
Pelican Investment Holdings, LLC doing business as AAP, Sunpath Ltd. and Seabury Asset Management LLC doing business as Mepco
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rogers v. Sunpath Ltd et al
as 4:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rogers
Defendant:
Sunpath Ltd and National Car Cure LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hafer v. SunPath, Ltd. et al
as 4:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Hafer
Defendant:
SunPath, Ltd. and AM Protection Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. SunPath, Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ruth Smith
Defendant:
SunPath, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Baldridge v. Sunpath Ltd
as 4:2021cv03629
Plaintiff:
Jerry Baldridge
Defendant:
Sunpath Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Bennett v. National Car Cure et al
as 1:2021cv11519
Plaintiff:
Tawni Bennett
Defendant:
National Car Cure, SUNPATH LTD., Ultimate Auto Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Fratilla et al v. SunPath LTD
as 0:2021cv61054
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Fratilla and Kesha Reid
Defendant:
SunPath LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
