Cases 11 - 20 of 1,337
Ms. Jaami Ali v. AT & T, et al
as 24-1682
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT & T, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Rose v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC
Defendant:
T Mobile US, Inc. and T Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Melvin Rideout v. T-Mobile USA, Inc
as 2:2024cv03824
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rideout
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
