Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Robinson v. Huttel et al
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
D. Huttel, Robert Ercole, R. Arrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv01829
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Lucas
Defendant:
United States of America , Mark W. Everson and Sarah S. Centeno
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Robinson v. Henschel et al
as 1:2010cv06212
Defendant:
J. Henschel, Ward, T. Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Viscuso et al
as 9:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
Rome, R.N. Staff, J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCAS v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv67426
Plaintiff:
TEOLA T. LUCAS
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Viscuso et al
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
Viscuso, Rome, R.N. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00073
Estate Plaintiff:
Teola T Lucas
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Malik Jones v. D. Vanderville, et al
as 10-15106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
D. VANDERVILLE, CORDDACK, A. PICKENS and others
Lucas et al v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08137
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Annette T. Lucas, Annette T. Lucas, Annette T. Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marco Perez v. D. L. Runnels, et al
as 09-16124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, M. WRIGHT, R. K. WONG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
