Cases 11 - 19 of 19
R.J. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03285
Plaintiff:
R.J. , DANIELLE BROWN , D.R.M. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loop Run Advisors et al v. T.S. Dudley Land Company et al
as 4:2013cv01961
Plaintiff:
Loop Run Advisors , Frank P. Daddona , Donald A. Daddona and others
Defendant:
T.S. Dudley Land Company, Anadarko E&P Company, LP , Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 4:2010cv01359
Petitioner:
Damon Johnson
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Connelly, Delbert G. Savers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv00312
Petitioner:
DAMON JOHNSON
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
T.E.
as 2:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
T.E., K.S. and T.S.
Defendant:
RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Standefer et al v. T.S. Dudley Land Company et al
as 3:2009cv01115
Plaintiff:
Euphemia Standefer, Euphemia Standefer, Scientific Living, Inc. and others
Defendant:
T.S. Dudley Land Company, T.S. Dudley Land Company, T.S. Dudley Land Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WASHINGTON, et al. v. C.O.T. MORGAN, et al
as 2:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
C.O.T. MORGAN, C.O.T. MORGAN, T.S. THARP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
